APIA Convention 2013

I’m at the APIA Convention, shortly before going to the closing dinner.  For those who are here or have been to Conventions in the past it needs no description.  For those who haven’t it is an amazing combination of conference, trade show, networking opportunity and big party.  I never have enough time to connect with all the people I would like to talk to, but it’s still the best opportunity each year.

From my perspective a highlight of the Convention this year has been the weighting given to human factors in the selection of presentations.  As well as a diversity of great presentations on engineering and business topics there were two presentations from the EPCRC RP4 program (sociology of safety), another two that gave a psychological perspective on safety, and others included knowledge transfer, engineer training, project managers vs. operations, and an interesting story on fatigue issues.  That’s about one third of the papers.  It’s becoming normal to talk about organisational culture and its implications for safety which can only be a good thing.  You can’t eliminate the potential for failure by engineering alone; people will have unique ways of making things go wrong.

Some of the papers also emphasised the fundamental difference between safety in the WHS sense (personnel safety) and public or operational safety (preventing catastrophic pipeline failures).  This distinction has been clear to me for so long that I’m always a bit surprised when I hear of people who don’t grasp it but I think the message is spreading.  They are very different.  Both  are important but they require quite different approaches.

This is a great industry to be part of.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Conferences. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to APIA Convention 2013

  1. Chris Hughes says:

    Peter, the number of things that those of us who have been involved in pipelines for 20-30 years take for granted to the extent that it surprises us when younger participants don’t grasp them is legion, and is probably one of the major reasons why we get so many mis-interpretations of AS2885 by inexperienced engineers since the Standard has largely been put together by people who can understand what is not explicitly stated but which makes the application of the standard practical.

  2. petertuft says:

    Chris,
    I was thinking more of very senior people, at the level where they have influence over their company’s overall priorities and budgets, rather than new entrants to the industry. The latter have time to learn and if the industry gets things right they will learn. Unfortunately there are some subtle hints that at very senior levels the the basis of operational safety might not always be as well understood as it should be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s